# No known master node

**URL:** <https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460>\
**Category:** Search Guard\
**Created:** [April 25, 2019, 3:36pm UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460 "2019-04-25T15:36:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ezhang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/22d042/32.png) [@ezhang](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/ezhang)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2019, 3:36pm UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/1 "2019-04-25T15:36:02Z")

</div>

Hi,  
I am using ES 6.5.4 with three node(10.107.122.81-83)  
SearchGuard 6.5.4-24.3.  
when I install the SearchGuard plugin on node2(10.107.122.82). the ES fails to start with below error messages.

[2019-04-25T08:26:43,242][WARN][o.e.c.l.LogConfigurator] [sgt-002] Some logging configurations have %marker but don’t have %node\_name. We will automatically add %node\_name to the pattern to ease the migration for users who customize log4j2.properties but will stop this behavior in 7.0. You should manually replace `%node_name` with `[%node_name]%marker ` in these locations:  
/etc/elasticsearch/log4j2.properties  
[2019-04-25T08:26:43,501][INFO][o.e.e.NodeEnvironment] [sgt-002] using [1] data paths, mounts [[/ (rootfs)]], net usable\_space [43.1gb], net total\_space [49.9gb], types [rootfs]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:43,501][INFO][o.e.e.NodeEnvironment] [sgt-002] heap size [3.9gb], compressed ordinary object pointers [true]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:43,534][INFO][o.e.n.Node] [sgt-002] node name [sgt-002], node ID [GnDUbCVARLGpnnsjUifJPA]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:43,534][INFO][o.e.n.Node] [sgt-002] version[6.5.4], pid[3975], build[default/tar/d2ef93d/2018-12-17T21:17:40.758843Z], OS[Linux/3.10.0-957.el7.x86\_64/amd64], JVM[Oracle Corporation/OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM/1.8.0\_201/25.201-b09]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:43,535][INFO][o.e.n.Node] [sgt-002] JVM arguments [-Xms4096m, -Xmx4096m, -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC, -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=75, -XX:+UseCMSInitiatingOccupancyOnly, -XX:+AlwaysPreTouch, -Xss1m, -Djava.awt.headless=true, -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8, -Djna.nosys=true, -XX:-OmitStackTraceInFastThrow, -Dio.netty.noUnsafe=true, -Dio.netty.noKeySetOptimization=true, -Dio.netty.recycler.maxCapacityPerThread=0, -Dlog4j.shutdownHookEnabled=false, -Dlog4j2.disable.jmx=true, -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError, -Des.path.home=/usr/share/elasticsearch, -Des.path.conf=/etc/elasticsearch, -Des.distribution.flavor=default, -Des.distribution.type=tar]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,316][INFO][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] ES Config path is /etc/elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,317][DEBUG][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] Client side initiated TLS renegotiation forcibly disabled. This can prevent DoS attacks. (jdk.tls.rejectClientInitiatedRenegotiation set to true).  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,363][INFO][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] OpenSSL not available (this is not an error, we simply fallback to built-in JDK SSL) because of java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: io.netty.internal.tcnative.SSL  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,369][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] JVM supports the following 4 protocols [SSLv2Hello, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,369][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] JVM supports the following 42 ciphers [TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDH\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDH\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDH\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDH\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDH\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDH\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDH\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDH\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDH\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDH\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDH\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDH\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,370][INFO][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Config directory is /etc/elasticsearch/, from there the key- and truststore files are resolved relatively  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,370][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Value for searchguard.ssl.transport.pemcert\_filepath is esnode.pem  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,370][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Resolved esnode.pem to /etc/elasticsearch/esnode.pem against /etc/elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,370][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Value for searchguard.ssl.transport.pemkey\_filepath is esnode-key.pem  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,370][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Resolved esnode-key.pem to /etc/elasticsearch/esnode-key.pem against /etc/elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,371][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Value for searchguard.ssl.transport.pemtrustedcas\_filepath is root-ca.pem  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,371][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Resolved root-ca.pem to /etc/elasticsearch/root-ca.pem against /etc/elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,438][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Value for searchguard.ssl.http.pemtrustedcas\_filepath is root-ca.pem  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,439][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Resolved root-ca.pem to /etc/elasticsearch/root-ca.pem against /etc/elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,439][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Value for searchguard.ssl.http.pemcert\_filepath is esnode.pem  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,439][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Resolved esnode.pem to /etc/elasticsearch/esnode.pem against /etc/elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,439][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Value for searchguard.ssl.http.pemkey\_filepath is esnode-key.pem  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,439][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Resolved esnode-key.pem to /etc/elasticsearch/esnode-key.pem against /etc/elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,442][INFO][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] TLS Transport Client Provider : JDK  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,442][INFO][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] TLS Transport Server Provider : JDK  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,442][INFO][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] TLS HTTP Provider : JDK  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,442][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] sslTransportClientProvider:JDK with ciphers [TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,442][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] sslTransportServerProvider:JDK with ciphers [TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,442][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] sslHTTPProvider:JDK with ciphers [TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_CBC\_SHA, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_ECDSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_256\_GCM\_SHA384, TLS\_ECDHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_RSA\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256, TLS\_DHE\_DSS\_WITH\_AES\_128\_GCM\_SHA256]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,443][INFO][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Enabled TLS protocols for transport layer : [TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,443][INFO][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] Enabled TLS protocols for HTTP layer : [TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,443][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] sslTransportClientProvider:JDK with protocols [TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,443][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] sslTransportServerProvider:JDK with protocols [TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,443][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.DefaultSearchGuardKeyStore] [sgt-002] sslHTTPProvider:JDK with protocols [TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,655][INFO][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] Clustername: ashdev-elasticsearch  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,656][DEBUG][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] This node [sgt-002] is a transportClient: false/tribeNode: false/tribeNodeClient: false  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,686][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.ReflectionHelper] [sgt-002] Loaded module Module [type=DLSFLS, implementing class=com.floragunn.searchguard.configuration.SearchGuardFlsDlsIndexSearcherWrapper]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,692][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [aggs-matrix-stats]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,692][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [analysis-common]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [ingest-common]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [lang-expression]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [lang-mustache]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [lang-painless]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [mapper-extras]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [parent-join]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [percolator]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [rank-eval]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [reindex]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [repository-url]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [transport-netty4]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [tribe]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-ccr]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-core]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-deprecation]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-graph]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-logstash]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-ml]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,693][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-monitoring]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,694][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-rollup]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,694][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-security]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,694][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-sql]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,694][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-upgrade]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,694][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded module [x-pack-watcher]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,694][INFO][o.e.p.PluginsService] [sgt-002] loaded plugin [search-guard-6]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:45,719][INFO][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] Disabled https compression by default to mitigate BREACH attacks. You can enable it by setting ‘http.compression: true’ in elasticsearch.yml  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,264][INFO][o.e.x.m.j.p.l.CppLogMessageHandler] [sgt-002] [controller/4064] [Main.cc@109] controller (64 bit): Version 6.5.4 (Build b616085ef32393) Copyright (c) 2018 Elasticsearch BV  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,414][INFO][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Configured categories on rest layer to ignore: [AUTHENTICATED, GRANTED\_PRIVILEGES]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,414][INFO][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Configured categories on transport layer to ignore: [AUTHENTICATED, GRANTED\_PRIVILEGES]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,414][INFO][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Configured Users to ignore: [kibanaserver]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,414][INFO][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Configured Users to ignore for read compliance events: [kibanaserver]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,414][INFO][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Configured Users to ignore for write compliance events: [kibanaserver]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,420][DEBUG][c.f.s.a.r.AsyncStoragePool] [sgt-002] Create new executor with threadPoolSize: 10 and maxQueueLen: 100000  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,421][INFO][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Message routing enabled: true  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,421][DEBUG][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Security Manager present  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,422][DEBUG][c.f.s.a.i.AuditLogImpl] [sgt-002] Shutdown Hook registered  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,422][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.ReflectionHelper] [sgt-002] Loaded module Module [type=AUDITLOG, implementing class=com.floragunn.searchguard.auditlog.impl.AuditLogImpl]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,423][WARN][c.f.s.c.ComplianceConfig] [sgt-002] If you plan to use field masking pls configure searchguard.compliance.salt to be a random string of 16 chars length identical on all nodes  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,424][INFO][c.f.s.c.ComplianceConfig] [sgt-002] PII configuration [auditLogPattern=org.joda.time.format.DateTimeFormatter@6b0ba697, auditLogIndex=null]: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,442][DEBUG][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] Compliance config is com.floragunn.searchguard.compliance.ComplianceConfig@1169fdfd because of dlsFlsAvailable: true and auditLog=class com.floragunn.searchguard.auditlog.impl.AuditLogImpl  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,443][DEBUG][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] Using com.floragunn.searchguard.transport.DefaultInterClusterRequestEvaluator as intercluster request evaluator class  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,445][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.ReflectionHelper] [sgt-002] Loaded module Module [type=MULTITENANCY, implementing class=com.floragunn.searchguard.configuration.PrivilegesInterceptorImpl]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,449][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.AdminDNs] [sgt-002] CN=kirk,OU=client,O=client,L=test, C=de is registered as an admin dn  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,450][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.AdminDNs] [sgt-002] Loaded 1 admin DN’s [CN=kirk,OU=client,O=client,L=test, C=de]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,451][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.AdminDNs] [sgt-002] Loaded 0 impersonation DN’s {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,451][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.AdminDNs] [sgt-002] Loaded 0 impersonation users for REST {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,454][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.ConfigurationLoader] [sgt-002] Index is: searchguard  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,455][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.LegacyConfigurationLoader] [sgt-002] Index is: searchguard  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,455][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type config with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.resolver.IndexResolverReplacer@c30f26d  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,456][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type config with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.http.XFFResolver@16944b58  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,464][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type config with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.auth.BackendRegistry@6487f7f8  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,471][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type roles with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.sgconf.ConfigModel@45f0038  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,471][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type rolesmapping with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.privileges.PrivilegesEvaluator@289a4b90  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,474][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type roles with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.privileges.PrivilegesEvaluator$TenantHolder@5f68eec6  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,475][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type config with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.configuration.CompatConfig@6cb194f5  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,478][DEBUG][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Subscribe on configuration changes by type config with listener com.floragunn.searchguard.SearchGuardPlugin$8@3dc2f14  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,664][DEBUG][o.e.a.ActionModule] [sgt-002] Using REST wrapper from plugin com.floragunn.searchguard.SearchGuardPlugin  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,681][DEBUG][c.f.s.h.SearchGuardHttpServerTransport] [sgt-002] using max\_chunk\_size[8kb], max\_header\_size[8kb], max\_initial\_line\_length[4kb], max\_content\_length[100mb], receive\_predictor[64kb-\>64kb], max\_composite\_buffer\_components[69905], pipelining[true], pipelining\_max\_events[10000]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:49,996][INFO][o.e.d.DiscoveryModule] [sgt-002] using discovery type [zen] and host providers [settings]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,663][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,663][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,664][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,664][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,665][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,665][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,666][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,666][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,667][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,667][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,668][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,668][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,669][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,669][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,670][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,670][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,670][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,671][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,671][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] Globally disabled endpoints: {}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,671][DEBUG][c.f.s.d.r.a.RestApiPrivilegesEvaluator] [sgt-002] No disabled endpoints/methods for permitted role sg\_all\_access found, allowing all  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,672][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.ReflectionHelper] [sgt-002] Loaded module Module [type=REST\_MANAGEMENT\_API, implementing class=com.floragunn.searchguard.dlic.rest.api.SearchGuardRestApiActions]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,672][DEBUG][c.f.s.SearchGuardPlugin] [sgt-002] Added 10 management rest handler(s)  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,672][INFO][o.e.n.Node] [sgt-002] initialized  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,672][INFO][o.e.n.Node] [sgt-002] starting …  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,738][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.t.SearchGuardSSLNettyTransport] [sgt-002] using profile[default], worker\_count[8], port[9300-9400], bind\_host[[0.0.0.0]], publish\_host[], compress[false], receive\_predictor[64kb-\>64kb]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,744][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.t.SearchGuardSSLNettyTransport] [sgt-002] binding server bootstrap to: [0.0.0.0]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,790][DEBUG][c.f.s.s.t.SearchGuardSSLNettyTransport] [sgt-002] Bound profile [default] to address {0.0.0.0:9300}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,791][INFO][o.e.t.TransportService] [sgt-002] publish\_address {10.107.122.82:9300}, bound\_addresses {0.0.0.0:9300}  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,829][INFO][o.e.b.BootstrapChecks] [sgt-002] bound or publishing to a non-loopback address, enforcing bootstrap checks  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,841][INFO][c.f.s.c.IndexBaseConfigurationRepository] [sgt-002] Check if searchguard index exists …  
[2019-04-25T08:26:50,847][DEBUG][o.e.a.a.i.e.i.TransportIndicesExistsAction] [sgt-002] no known master node, scheduling a retry  
[2019-04-25T08:26:51,017][WARN][c.f.s.s.t.SearchGuardSSLNettyTransport] [sgt-002] send message failed [channel: NettyTcpChannel{localAddress=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:45048, remoteAddress=/10.107.122.81:9300}]  
java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException: null  
at io.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.channelInactive(…)(Unknown Source) ~[?:?]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:51,017][WARN][c.f.s.s.t.SearchGuardSSLNettyTransport] [sgt-002] send message failed [channel: NettyTcpChannel{localAddress=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:34658, remoteAddress=/10.107.122.83:9300}]  
java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException: null  
at io.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.channelInactive(…)(Unknown Source) ~[?:?]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:51,946][WARN][c.f.s.s.t.SearchGuardSSLNettyTransport] [sgt-002] send message failed [channel: NettyTcpChannel{localAddress=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:45050, remoteAddress=/10.107.122.81:9300}]  
java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException: null  
at io.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.channelInactive(…)(Unknown Source) ~[?:?]  
[2019-04-25T08:26:51,959][WARN][c.f.s.s.t.SearchGuardSSLNettyTransport] [sgt-002] send message failed [channel: NettyTcpChannel{localAddress=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:34664, remoteAddress=/10.107.122.83:9300}]  
java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException: null

ES config:

cluster.name: ashdev-elasticsearch

node.name: sgt-002

path.data: “/var/lib/elasticsearch”

path.logs: “/var/log/elasticsearch”

node.master: true

node.data: true

network.host: 0.0.0.0

discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts:

- 10.107.122.81

- 10.107.122.82

- 10.107.122.83

discovery.zen.minimum\_master\_nodes: 2

######## Start Search Guard Demo Configuration ########

# WARNING: revise all the lines below before you go into production

searchguard.ssl.transport.pemcert\_filepath: esnode.pem

searchguard.ssl.transport.pemkey\_filepath: esnode-key.pem

searchguard.ssl.transport.pemtrustedcas\_filepath: root-ca.pem

searchguard.ssl.transport.enforce\_hostname\_verification: false

searchguard.ssl.http.enabled: true

searchguard.ssl.http.pemcert\_filepath: esnode.pem

searchguard.ssl.http.pemkey\_filepath: esnode-key.pem

searchguard.ssl.http.pemtrustedcas\_filepath: root-ca.pem

searchguard.allow\_unsafe\_democertificates: true

searchguard.allow\_default\_init\_sgindex: true

searchguard.authcz.admin\_dn:

- CN=kirk,OU=client,O=client,L=test, C=de

searchguard.audit.type: internal\_elasticsearch

searchguard.enable\_snapshot\_restore\_privilege: true

searchguard.check\_snapshot\_restore\_write\_privileges: true

searchguard.restapi.roles\_enabled: [“sg\_all\_access”]

cluster.routing.allocation.disk.threshold\_enabled: false

node.max\_local\_storage\_nodes: 3

xpack.security.enabled: false

######## End Search Guard Demo Configuration ########

SearchGard conf:

searchguard:  
dynamic:  
http:  
anonymous\_auth\_enabled: false  
xff:  
enabled: false  
remoteIpHeader: ‘x-forwarded-for’  
proxiesHeader: ‘x-forwarded-by’  
authc:  
kerberos\_auth\_domain:  
http\_enabled: false  
transport\_enabled: false  
order: 6  
http\_authenticator:  
challenge: true  
config:  
krb\_debug: false  
strip\_realm\_from\_principal: true  
authentication\_backend:  
type: noop  
basic\_internal\_auth\_domain:  
http\_enabled: true  
transport\_enabled: true  
order: 4  
http\_authenticator:  
type: basic  
challenge: true  
authentication\_backend:  
type: intern  
proxy\_auth\_domain:  
http\_enabled: false  
transport\_enabled: false  
order: 3  
http\_authenticator:  
type: proxy  
challenge: false  
config:  
user\_header: “x-proxy-user”  
roles\_header: “x-proxy-roles”  
authentication\_backend:  
type: noop  
jwt\_auth\_domain:  
http\_enabled: false  
transport\_enabled: false  
order: 0  
http\_authenticator:  
type: jwt  
challenge: false  
config:  
signing\_key: “base64 encoded HMAC key or public RSA/ECDSA pem key”  
jwt\_header: “Authorization”  
jwt\_url\_parameter: null  
roles\_key: null  
subject\_key: null  
authentication\_backend:  
type: noop  
clientcert\_auth\_domain:  
http\_enabled: false  
transport\_enabled: false  
order: 2  
http\_authenticator:  
type: clientcert  
config:  
challenge: false  
authentication\_backend:  
type: noop  
ldap:  
http\_enabled: false  
transport\_enabled: false  
order: 5  
http\_authenticator:  
type: basic  
challenge: false  
authentication\_backend:  
config:  
enable\_ssl: false  
enable\_start\_tls: false  
enable\_ssl\_client\_auth: false  
verify\_hostnames: true  
hosts:  
- localhost:8389  
bind\_dn: null  
password: null  
userbase: ‘ou=people,dc=example,dc=com’  
usersearch: ‘(sAMAccountName={0})’  
username\_attribute: null  
authz:  
roles\_from\_myldap:  
http\_enabled: false  
transport\_enabled: false  
authorization\_backend:  
config:  
enable\_ssl: false  
enable\_start\_tls: false  
enable\_ssl\_client\_auth: false  
verify\_hostnames: true  
hosts:  
- localhost:8389  
bind\_dn: null  
password: null  
rolebase: ‘ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com’  
rolesearch: ‘(member={0})’  
userroleattribute: null  
userrolename: disabled  
rolename: cn  
resolve\_nested\_roles: true  
userbase: ‘ou=people,dc=example,dc=com’  
usersearch: ‘(uid={0})’  
roles\_from\_another\_ldap:  
enabled: false  
authorization\_backend:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jkressin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.search-guard.com/jkressin/32/9_2.png) [@jkressin](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/jkressin)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2019, 4:01pm UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/2 "2019-04-25T16:01:31Z")

</div>

Hi,

so if I read your post correctly, you installed Search Guard on only one node, is that correct?

You need to install Search Guard on all nodes in your cluster. Search Guard secures the inter-cluster (node-to-node) traffic with TLS. For that, all nodes need to be able to talk TLS, so you need to have SG installed on all of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jkressin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.search-guard.com/jkressin/32/9_2.png) [@jkressin](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/jkressin)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2019, 4:01pm UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/3 "2019-04-25T16:01:37Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ezhang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/22d042/32.png) [@ezhang](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/ezhang)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2019, 1:46am UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/4 "2019-04-26T01:46:50Z")

</div>

yes. I just install the SearchGuard on one node. I will try to install the searchGuard on all the cluster node to see if it works.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ezhang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/22d042/32.png) [@ezhang](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/ezhang)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2019, 6:04am UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/5 "2019-04-26T06:04:37Z")

</div>

after install the SearchGuard on all nodes. It seems SearchGuard work as expected. Thanks jkressin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ezhang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/22d042/32.png) [@ezhang](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/ezhang)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2019, 2:30am UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/6 "2019-04-29T02:30:10Z")

</div>

@jkressin, we have DigiCertGlobalRootCA.pem , DigiCertSHA2SecureServerCA.pem and server certificate.  
I want to replace the demo CERTs( with our own CERTs)  
searchguard.ssl.transport.pemcert\_filepath: esnode.pem(our server CERT)

searchguard.ssl.transport.pemkey\_filepath: esnode-key.pem(our server CERT KEY)

searchguard.ssl.transport.pemtrustedcas\_filepath: root-ca.pem

searchguard.ssl.transport.enforce\_hostname\_verification: false

So what should the roo-ca.pem like? Should it only content the intermediate CERT or should it content both the DigiCertGlobalRootCA.pem , DigiCertSHA2SecureServerCA.pem?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ezhang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/22d042/32.png) [@ezhang](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/ezhang)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2019, 3:47pm UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/7 "2019-04-29T15:47:37Z")

</div>

I figure it myself. the root-ca.pem should only contain DigiCertGlobalRootCA.pem. put DigiCertSHA2SecureServerCA.pem and server CERT together as the node CERT.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jkressin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.search-guard.com/jkressin/32/9_2.png) [@jkressin](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/jkressin)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2019, 5:43pm UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/8 "2019-04-29T17:43:59Z")

</div>

Just for the sake of completeness:

Actually, it does not really matter how you do it 😉 For TLS, the only important thing is that the chain is complete when comparing the certificates.

The way you did it is the most common and recommended way: Include the intermediate certificates in your node/server certificate.

However, you could have also put the intermediate certificate in the root CA file. That would also work because in both cases the chain is complete.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.search-guard.com/system/32/1870_2.png) [@system](https://forum.search-guard.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2019, 5:44pm UTC](https://forum.search-guard.com/t/no-known-master-node/1460/9 "2019-05-20T17:44:00Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 21 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
